Sunday, 14 March 2021

International Women's Day 2021

DOWNLOAD FULL EPISODE

You’re listening to Back in the USSR.  It’s been a difficult last few week’s comrades and friends.  Keeping my morale up has been very hard, but I’m finally ready to do this long-planned episode on International Women’s Day 2021, even if it is a little late.  This past year has been absolutely crucial in the struggle for women’s rights all over the world.  The pandemic has affected women particularly harshly and has exacerbated the inequalities and structural oppression that they face.  Women are the majority of essential and frontline workers.  Women continue to bear a disproportionate share of household labor and child-rearing in addition to their work outside the home.  And women have been facing an additional epidemic of femicide and patriarchal violence that has surged all over the world alongside COVID-19. 

One day after International Women’s Day, on March 9 2021, the World Health Organization released a report based on the largest ever study conducted on violence against women.  The report covered the period between 2000 and 2018 and concluded that violence against women remains “devastatingly pervasive” across the globe, with one in every three women in the world facing some form of physical or sexual violence.  More specifically, the report found that one out of every four young women (aged between 15-24 years) has experienced violence at the hands of an intimate partner by their mid-twenties.  Violence by an intimate partner is the most prevalent form of violence against women by far.  According to the study, in 90% of reported cases (641 million out of 736 million) the perpetrator was either the husband or a partner.  These are shocking numbers, but the report added that because violence against women is so underreported due to social stigma and various structural reasons, the real number is much higher.  While the highest levels of patriarchal violence were found to be in South Asia, WHO director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus made the point that “violence against women is endemic in every country and culture, causing harm to millions of women and their families”. 

While the WHO report, which was made in partnership with the UN, did not include data collected during the COVID pandemic, it emphasized that violence against women has increased since it began.  UN Women executive director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka even said that COVID had triggered a “shadow pandemic” of increasing violence against women and girls, the lockdowns and quarantines in particular rendering them more vulnerable to intimate partner violence.

This is the situation that we’re facing today.  But women are fighting back.  Women across the entire world are fighting back bravely, in the midst of the pandemic, against the patriarchal systems imposed on them and are refusing to be silent: fighting for a world where their rights, their equality, their dignity are non-negotiable.

Last year I talked about the massive demonstrations that took place on International Women’s Day 2020, where two million women marched in downtown Santiago, the capital of Chile, defying the neo-liberal regime of Sebastian Pinera and a police force notorious for its brutal assaults and sexual crimes.  All over Latin America and around the world, millions of women marched against growing inequality, the rising rate of femicide and anti-women violence, as well as reactionary laws against abortion.

International Women’s Day 2021 was no different.  Despite the pandemic and the lockdowns in addition to police repression, millions of women still came out to march.  From Argentina to Mexico, millions of women marched to demand equality in the most unequal region in the world, and to proclaim that they refuse to continue being marginalized, discriminated against, excluded and murdered. 

In Buenos Aires the Not One (Woman) Less movement marched alongside trade unions and social organizations to demand equal rights for women in the workplace, respect for trans rights in the workplace, and to demand the approval of the Emergency Law on Gender Violence.  In the course of the first 67 days of 2021, 65 women have been murdered in Argentina for the simple fact of being a woman.

In Brazil, thousands of women took to the streets of major cities to demand the impeachment of Jair Bolsonaro, the far-right president who has presided over a horrific escalation in femicides and violence against women and the LGBTQ community.  Women’s organizations also condemned the government’s callous mismanagement of the pandemic and its pro-business policies that have resulted in rising hunger, poverty and unemployment, which also disproportionately impact women.

In Chile, at least 500,000 women came out into the streets of Santiago at the iconic Dignity Plaza in opposition to Sebastian Pinera’s right-wing government.  These women faced tear gas and water cannon but stood strong and forced the police to retreat.  Across the country, millions of Chilean women took part in a national strike calling for gender parity in all realms, non-sexist education, and the right to free, legal and safe abortion.

Thousands of women in the Dominican Republic demanded reproductive rights as well as that femicide and other forms of anti-women violence be included as punishable offenses in the country’s penal code.

In El Salvador, thousands of women gathered in the capital to call for the legalization of abortion.  Journalists and reporters also joined this march to demand the right to cover and report on gender-based violence, which is effectively banned under the country’s reactionary laws.

In Honduras, one of three Latin America countries (along with El Salvador and the Dominican Republic) where abortion is banned under all circumstances, women marched against a wave of femicides that has claimed over fifty lives since the beginning of the year.  But the legacy of Berta Caceres lives on and Honduran women will not be silent in the face of a capitalist system that is destroying the land as well as their bodies.

In Mexico, a country with one of the highest rates of femicide in the world, tens of thousands of women marched in the capital and turned the metal fence surrounding the National Palace into a “wall of memory”, covering it with the names and faces of thousands of women killed in recent years.

Similar marches were held in Guatemala, Ecuador and Colombia.

But it wasn’t only in Latin America where mass mobilization took place on International Women’s Day.  All across Europe women came out in droves to protest the rise in femicide, misogyny and conservative far-right laws oppressing them. 

In Poland in particular, thousands of women demonstrated across the country under the leadership of the National Women’s Strike, protesting against the blatant misogyny of the right-wing government and its recent ban on abortions.  This is a country where upwards of 500 women die every year as a result of domestic violence and where 94% of those who suffer rape or molestation do not report it to authorities.

In France, women’s organizations and trade unions organized 150 mobilizations across the country, protesting the rise in violence against women that has spun out of control since the pandemic began.  The organization Greve Feministe also pointed out that “Women, increasingly migrant women, make up the majority of those in care, health, education and cleaning jobs…They are underpaid and get little or no recognition…Despite the beautiful promises, no substantive negotiations have taken place in this direction!”

Similar actions took place in Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland and the UK.  And it was in the UK on March 13 where London cops would brutally suppress a vigil for Sarah Everard, who herself was abducted and murdered by a police officer, and try to silence those speaking out in her memory.  As one of the participants in that rally said, “The irony of it is so explicit – are you going to drag women off the street for protesting about a woman being dragged off the street?” In a follow-up protest at Parliament Square the next day, the names of women killed by their partners, or who have died in UK prisons, were read out.

But I want to return to India, a country that really should be in the news more often given what has been happening over the last few months.  I’ve talked before about the farmer’s strike that has been going on there since last December and how millions of Indian workers have struck in solidarity with the farmers, facing the far-right government of Prime Minister Modi with its biggest challenge in years.  But attention must be paid to the crucial role that women have played in all of this.  Right from the beginning they have played a key organizing role in the farmer’s movement against the government’s neo-liberal agricultural laws and it has been a life-changing experience for many of them. 

The many thousands of women who gathered at Tikri and Singhu outside New Delhi on March 8th, in a Women’s Day demonstration that was epic in every way, included everyone from teenagers to 80-year-old elders.  They came from all over, even from remote parts of Haryana and Punjab, organized by the All-India Democratic Women Association, the Center of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) and other groups.  One of the woman farmers, Sheela Butana, who came to the demonstration alongside fifty other women from her home village, condemned the farm laws that were condemning her family to financial ruin, but also highlighted the empowerment that this movement has given to women: “There is no doubt that the movement provided equal opportunities (to women) but the real battle remains to be fought in families and farms where we are still less valued in comparison with men although our hard labor remains the same.”

Jagmati Sangwan of the All-India Democratic Women Association told the progressive Indian news organization News Click that “The fact of the matter is women have only 13% (land) entitlements whereas they contribute 70% to farming (labor).  It has simply deprived us from nearly all welfare schemes, be it compensation for damage of crops or any relief if she dies by suicide due to agrarian distress…women are suffering at every front.”

In India, 71% of women in rural areas are engaged in agriculture, compared with 53% of men, but 83% of agricultural land is inherited by male family members and female farmers lack access to even basic loans and infrastructure due to the patriarchal nature of the system.

Sangwan praised the farmer’s movement for recognizing the role of women in the struggle and that the value of their labor and access to land must be made equal to that of men.

In reference to the deep chauvinism and impunity that has characterized India under the current Modi government, one of the women speakers at the rally said, “My dear sisters, the struggle is not just limited to these farm laws alone.  Please reject all Manuwadi theories which have so far limited your identity to child-bearing mothers.”

It was noteworthy that the stages at these rallies were guarded by exclusively women guards, highlighting the reality that India is among the most violent places for women in the world and this has required women to band together for self-defence.  Many speakers at the rallies announced their resolve to “struggle for the right to equality in society and strive to fight against oppression and discrimination women have been subjected to.”

The self-confidence that the farmer’s movement has given to many Indian rural women was captured in the words of one woman who arrived at the rally by tractor from Haryana: “This is women’s power.  It makes me believe that I can do anything…Long Live Women’s Unity!”

These defiant words, this confidence, reminds me of what the women of Petrograd must have felt on March 8 1917 when they walked off the job in the city’s textile mills in the Vyborg District, initially protest against the food shortages and high price of bread, but soon began chanting “down with the war,” and “down with the monarchy”.  The strike spread and drew in tens of thousands of workers and soldiers.  Eight days later, the Tsar abdicated. 

Women were the vanguard of the Russian Revolution.  Socialist women, including many who were members of Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevik party, played an important part locally and nationally. They distributed agitation leaflets, agitated among peasant women, and continued to spearhead strikes and demonstrations.  The Bolshevik Vera Slutskaya led the establishment of a party bureau dedicated to organizing women and reviving the Rabotnitsa (The Woman Worker). The publication encouraged women to demand more, to participate in their local Soviets, and to join their fellow workers on strike.

In March 1917, laundry workers led by Bolshevik Sofia Goncharskya, struck for weeks; in April, 100,000 soldiers’ wives demanded better rations and an end to the war; in August, Bolshevik women organized armed defense. “Red Sisters” provided medical assistance and built barricades in Petrograd during General Kornilov’s reactionary coup attempt.  Women in the Red Guards laid down their lives in defense of the revolution. Bolsheviks played a role locally and nationally, speaking at public meetings, distributing leaflets, transporting weapons, guaranteeing communications and providing care for the wounded.

In July 1917, women over the age of 20 were formally given the right to vote and hold public office. November 1917, in the wake of the October Revolution of the Bolshevik seizure of power, was the first opportunity for women to exercise this right and they did.  In some areas, such as Yaroslavl, women turnout outnumbered that of men.

When socialist revolution comes to India, as it did to Russia, women will most certainly be at the forefront.  And the same applies to other countries where patriarchal violence reinforces capitalism and facilitates the double oppression that women face, which is reinforced still further in many parts of the world by structures of racism, empire and colonialism.  There can be no revolution without women, and that includes queer women and trans women too.

The following is an excerpt from Alexandra Kollontai’s 1920 article, “International Women’s Day”:

Women’s Day, or Working Women’s Day, is a day of international solidarity, and a day for reviewing the strength and organization of proletarian women.

But this is not a special day for women alone. The 8th of March is a historic and memorable day for the workers and peasants, for all the Russian workers and for the workers of the whole world. In 1917, on this day, the great February revolution broke out. It was the working women of Petersburg who began this revolution; it was they who first decided to raise the banner of opposition to the Tsar and his associates. And so, working women’s day is a double celebration for us.

[Women’s Day] turned out above all to be an excellent method of agitation among the less political of our proletarian sisters. They could not help but turn their attention to the meetings, demonstrations, posters, pamphlets and newspapers that were devoted to Women’s Day. Even the politically backward working woman thought to herself: “This is our day, the festival for working women,” and she hurried to the meetings and demonstrations. After each Working Women’s Day, more women joined the socialist parties and the trade unions grew. Organizations improved and political consciousness developed.

These are the results of working women’s day of militancy. The day of working women’s militancy helps increase the consciousness and organization of proletarian women. And this means that its contribution is essential to the success of those fighting for a better future for the working class.

“Working Women’s Day” was first organized ten years ago in the campaign for the political equality of women and the struggle for socialism. This aim has been achieved by the working-class women in Russia. In the Soviet Republic the working women and peasants don’t need to fight for the franchise and for civil rights.

But rights alone are not enough. We have to learn to make use of them. The right to vote is a weapon which we have to learn to master for our own benefit, and for the good of the workers’ republic. In the two years of Soviet power, life itself has not been absolutely changed. We are only in the process of struggling for communism and we are surrounded by the world we have inherited from the dark and repressive past. Working women and peasant women can only rid themselves of this situation and achieve equality in life itself, and not just in law, if they put all their energies into making Russia a truly communist society.

After the experience of the Russian October revolution, it is clear to every working woman in France, in England and in other countries that only the dictatorship of the working class, only the power of the soviets can guarantee complete and absolute equality, the ultimate victory of communism will tear down the century-old chains of repression and lack of rights.

Only the overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of Soviet power will save them from the world of suffering, humiliations and inequality that makes the life of the working woman in the capitalist countries so hard. The Working Woman’s Day turns from a day of struggle for the franchise into an international day of struggle for the full and absolute liberation of women, which means a struggle for the victory of the soviets and for communism!

Sunday, 14 February 2021

Black History Month: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Black Radical Tradition

DOWNLOAD FULL EPISODE

This is Back in the USSR, I am Siegfried.  I want to apologize for not recording a new show last week, comrades and friends, but I’ve got a lot going on these days and sometimes it’s a challenge getting new content together.  But this is Black History Month.  Last week I played an episode I put out in February 2020 about George Jackson, the African-American revolutionary who challenged the racist capitalist state in America from inside its very dungeons, and gave his life in the name of dignity and liberation.  It might not be new content, but it’s still more than relevant to what I want to discuss today on the subject of Black Liberation. 

The first weeks of the Biden Administration saw a very, very old story get played out again.  Namely the U.S. political establishment’s, and the Democratic Party in particular’s, institutionalized policy of taking black people and black votes for granted.  I don’t agree with Tim Wise on a lot of things, but he was spot on ten years ago when he titled one of his books “Between Barack and a Hard Place” and warned about something called “racism 2.0”.  What he meant by that was that a certain segment of White America, the liberal segment, was now willing to “make exceptions” when it came to certain black people.  That it was willing to recruit certain black people into high political office so long as they served the corporate interests of the capitalist state and didn’t do anything to fundamentally challenge white privilege.  Barack Obama played that role well: he was a neoliberal, he bailed out Wall Street, passed legislation favorable to the capitalist class, waged wars to expand and maintain the American Empire, and passed only the most token reforms.  Now we have Kamala Harris, a woman who built her career on the mass incarceration of other black people in California, buttressing Joe Biden, one of the key architects of mass incarceration in America, who further masked his racist political record by hiding behind a twelve-year-old black poet on inauguration day.  And given Biden’s record with women and girls, I’m just glad that he kept his hands to himself that day.

What we see is black people being caught between a neoliberal capitalist party (the Democrats) that uses them and exploits them for political gain before turning around and pursuing austerity and mass incarceration policies that hurt them on one hand, and a white supremacist fascist goon squad (the Republicans) on the other.  And this is nothing new.  I’ve talked about the African-American civil rights leader and towering internationalist, W.E.B. Du Bois on this show before.  He was talking about this kind of bait and switch politics back in the 1920s and 30s, with Democrats and Republicans making hollow promises to black people at election time even though neither party was actually going to do anything to challenge Jim Crow segregation or lynch mob terrorism.  Anti-lynching legislation pushed by Du Bois and the NAACP was tabled in Washington in the mid-1920s, but to this day no such legislation has ever been passed.

I’ve mentioned on this show before that Du Bois, who was among the founders of the NAACP and helped spearhead the founding of the modern civil rights movement around the turn of the 20th Century, was originally hopeful that US involvement in WW1 would lead to meaningful reform and a breakdown of racial segregation.  He even hoped that the Versailles Treaty in 1919 would lead to self-determination for colonized peoples in Africa and Asia, who, like many African-American soldiers, had shed their blood for the Allied cause during the war.  Great promises had been made, US President Woodrow Wilson was talking about a new era of democracy around the world and it seemed like change was coming. 

But all that Du Bois and the other hopeful reformers received, both in Black America and the Global South, including people like Ho Chi Minh and Mao Zedong, was a knife in back.  European colonization continued with the British and French Empires carving up the Middle East between themselves and refusing to relax their grip on Africa and Asia.  Returning African-American veterans were greeted by the so-called Red Summer of 1919, with Black Americans being lynched and murdered in record numbers amid absolute impunity.  More than anything else, even the 1917 October Revolution which inspired them greatly, this betrayal of colonized and oppressed peoples by Western governments is what made W.E.B Du Bois and many others around the world into revolutionaries.

Now compare this betrayal in 1919, both in Versailles and in Washington, with the betrayal currently underway in 2021.  Biden has initiated “prison reform” that frees no one, nor does it remove the profit motive from the American prison system or address the atrocity of kids being put in cages in ICE detention facilities – an issue that has dropped out of the media almost entirely since Trump left office.  He has promised $2000 stimulus cheques which have still not appeared.  He promised a $15 federal minimum wage…but not until 2025.  He has promised to withdraw support for Saudi Arabia over the genocidal war against Yemen, but to keep “defensive” military aid in place.  Virtually every executive order he has signed over the past few weeks has proven to be hollow window dressing upon closer inspection.  This is what betrayal looks like and it’s a betrayal that disproportionately affects black people and people of color in general. 

In the words of Sun Tzu, the great Chinese military strategist, “Words of peace but no treaty are signs of a plot.”

The great civil rights leader W.E.B. Du Bois, a strong supporter of African and Asian liberation movements, and who left the liberal NAACP over its anti-communism and its failure to engage in mass political mobilization against segregation, would recognize the current spree of performative actions by Biden and his supporters for what they are.  Black faces in high places are nothing but a form of racial tokenism unless they are accompanied by radical policy changes and meaningful emancipatory politics.  This is the reason why prominent black radicals like Cornel West ultimately broke with the Obama administration, despite their initial hopes that his election would mark the end of “Reaganite politics” in America and do something to stop police brutality and murder of black people.  Once again, Ferguson and BLM would never have happened if Obama had lived up to the hope that people placed in him.

Capitalist America is deeply afraid of black radicalism and of black people who actually fight for liberation against the capitalist colonial system that keeps their people suppressed.  This is why it killed the Black Panthers Fred Hampton and Mark Clark.  This is why it imprisoned Angela Davis and Huey Newton, and forced Assata Shakur and Robert Williams into exile.  This is why it was certainly responsible for the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X.  This is why Paul Robeson was blacklisted and had his passport taken away. 

And this is why W.E.B. Du Bois was put on trial in 1951, along with the other leaders of the Peace Information Center (PIC), one of the first organizations in the world to push for a ban on nuclear weapons, and accused of being a foreign agent.  The US government blocked Du Bois from attending the Bandung Conference of Third World nations in 1955 for similar reasons: it didn’t want to see Black Americans joining hands with other formerly colonized peoples in defiance of imperialism.

But, of course, alongside these “bad” black people whom the US power structure has framed as criminals and traitors, there are “good” black people like Obama and Harris who always play by the rules and always work within the system and for the system.  Du Bois was rightfully angry that the NAACP, the same African-American civil rights organization he helped to found decades earlier, basically abandoned him when he was put on trial in 1951 – it didn’t want to be associated with “radicalism” and lose its access to the Washington elite.  The NAACP was also, at best, a fair-weather-friend to Martin Luther King and utterly condemned him when he began to vocally oppose the Vietnam War in 1967.  This is the way colonial regimes work: those among the oppressed who serve the colonial power structure are often elevated and given privileges, while those who push for genuine emancipation and liberation are repressed.  But compradors are rewarded; White America loves them and might even vote for them.

White America doesn’t like black people who say things like what W.E.B. Du Bois said at the New York Scientific and Cultural Conference for World Peace in 1949: “I tell you, people of America, the dark world is on the move! It wants and will have Freedom, Autonomy and Equality.  It will not be diverted in these fundamental rights by dialectical splitting of political hairs…Whites may, if they will, arm themselves for suicide.  But the vast majority of the world’s peoples will march on over them to freedom!”

This is not the kind of stuff that the White Power Structure likes to hear.  But it loves when Barack Obama plays to white stereotypes by lecturing black men about morality and fatherhood. 

In the 1950s, and when he was well into his eighties, Du Bois wrote an essay entitled “Negroes and the Crisis of Capitalism in the United States”.  In a truly prescient paragraph, he argues that: “The organized effort of American industry to usurp government surpasses anything in modern history…From the use of psychology to spread truth has come the use of organized gathering of news to guide public opinion, then deliberately to mislead it by scientific advertising and propaganda…Mass capitalistic control of books and periodicals, news gathering and distribution, radio, cinema, and television has made the throttling of democracy possible and the distortion of education and failure of justice widespread.”

W.E.B. Du Bois was born on February 23, 1868 and died on August 27, 1963 at the age of 95 and his political/academic career spanned nearly seventy years, hundreds of books and articles and every major African-American social movement of the early 20th Century from the Niagara Movement to the Haarlem Renaissance to the NAACP to the Communist Party and beyond.  In 1895, he was the first black man to gain a PhD from Harvard and spent most of his life as an academic and/or newspaper editor.

During his long life, at one time or another, he embraced just about every attempt at bringing systemic racism to an end: from integration to black separatism to international communism to Third World internationalism and solidarity, visiting both China and the Soviet Union before living out his last days in Ghana in close collaboration with the revolutionary president Kwame Nkrumah.  Even in the 1920s he was organizing international conferences in an effort to unify the anti-colonial movements in Africa with the liberation struggle of African Americans.  He joined the Communist Party USA in 1961 at the age of 93, writing: “I believe in Communism.  I mean by Communism, a planned way of life in the production of wealth and work designed for building a state whose object is the highest welfare of its people and not merely the profit of a part.”

On the day after he died in Accra, Ghana, the celebrated March on Washington took place on August 28 1963.  Speaker Roy Wilkins asked the hundreds of thousands of marchers to give a moment of silence for Du Bois, honoring the man who had stood in vocal and active defiance against a racist society for nearly a century…a society that had tried hard to shut him up, but failed time and again. 

Du Bois had come to Ghana to work on the proposed Encyclopedia Africana, a work that would place the history of black people front and center rather than subordinated to white European narratives, but he was destined never to complete it.  On their last meeting, he took Kwame Nkrumah’s hand and thanked him for making it possible for him to finish his life in Africa.  He had only one regret: “I failed you – my strength gave out before I could carry out our plans for the encyclopedia.  Forgive an old man.” Even at 95, Du Bois had wanted to do so much more.  The first president of the Republic of Ghana left the room in tears.

This is how W.E.B. Du Bois lived.  And to do justice to his life, this show would need to be one hundred times as long.  But I hope I’ve demonstrated something about the depth of the black radical tradition and that it is strong enough to win through against the lies, violence and obfuscations that currently fill the North American airwaves and political spaces.  There will only be a future if racism and systems of exploitation that facilitate it are broken down and replaced by the politics and economics of liberation.  Du Bois and so many other black heroes understood that the future is socialism.